Compare CA PPM, Nozbe, Oracle Primavera, and Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management

Pricing

 
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
 
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
 
Project Online Premium
$55
/User/Month
 
Project Online Professional
$30
/User/Month
 
Project Online Essentials
$7
/User/Month
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
CA PPM
Free Trial Unavailable
Nozbe
Free Trial
Oracle Primavera
Free Trial Unavailable
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
Project Online Premium
$55/User/Month
Project Online Professional
$30/User/Month
Project Online Essentials
$7/User/Month
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
7.6
8.6
8.7
8.3
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
6.6
8.1
6.8
7.2
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
5.6
Not enough data available
5.6
7.5
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
6.4
Not enough data available
6.7
7.6
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
6.4
8.2
6.7
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
7.6
Not enough data available
7.1
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
5.6
7.3
6.2
6.5
Meets Requirements
CA PPM
7.6
Nozbe
8.6
Oracle Primavera
8.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Ease of Use
CA PPM
6.6
Nozbe
8.1
Oracle Primavera
6.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.2
Ease of Setup
CA PPM
5.6
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
5.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Admin
CA PPM
6.4
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Quality of Support
CA PPM
6.4
Nozbe
8.2
Oracle Primavera
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
CA PPM
7.6
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
7.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
CA PPM
5.6
Nozbe
7.3
Oracle Primavera
6.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
6.5

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
CA PPM
7.8
Nozbe
9.0
Oracle Primavera
8.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.4
Due Dates
CA PPM
7.8
Nozbe
8.8
Oracle Primavera
8.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.5
Task Prioritization
CA PPM
7.4
Nozbe
8.7
Oracle Primavera
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.2
To-Do Lists
CA PPM
7.2
Nozbe
9.3
Oracle Primavera
7.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
CA PPM
7.2
Nozbe
8.7
Oracle Primavera
7.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Comments
CA PPM
6.7
Nozbe
9.6
Oracle Primavera
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Documents and Uploads
CA PPM
7.4
Nozbe
8.8
Oracle Primavera
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
CA PPM
7.3
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
9.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.6
Calendar View
CA PPM
7.2
Nozbe
8.8
Oracle Primavera
8.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Baselining / KPIs
CA PPM
7.4
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Project Budgeting
CA PPM
7.4
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Issue Tracking
CA PPM
6.7
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
7.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
CA PPM
7.8
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Portfolio Budgeting
CA PPM
7.4
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
What-If Scenarios
CA PPM
7.3
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Workflow
CA PPM
6.7
Nozbe
8.6
Oracle Primavera
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Request Management
CA PPM
7.1
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
7.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Cost Tracking
CA PPM
7.3
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
ROI and Forecasting
CA PPM
7.0
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Risk Analysis
CA PPM
7.3
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
7.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Resource Management
Resource Database
CA PPM
7.9
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Resource Allocation
CA PPM
7.5
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Workload Capacity
CA PPM
7.6
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Time Tracking
CA PPM
8.1
Nozbe
Not enough data available
Oracle Primavera
8.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Platform
Alerts
CA PPM
7.0
Nozbe
9.3
Oracle Primavera
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Mobile
CA PPM
5.8
Nozbe
8.5
Oracle Primavera
6.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.0
User, Role, and Access Management
CA PPM
7.1
Nozbe
9.0
Oracle Primavera
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
API / Integrations
CA PPM
6.3
Nozbe
8.9
Oracle Primavera
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Reporting and Dashboards
CA PPM
7.6
Nozbe
7.2
Oracle Primavera
7.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Customization
CA PPM
7.3
Nozbe
7.4
Oracle Primavera
6.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Performance and Reliability
CA PPM
7.4
Nozbe
9.2
Oracle Primavera
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
0%
53.8%
22.0%
24.7%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
26.8%
38.5%
25.4%
27.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
73.2%
7.7%
52.5%
48.1%
CA PPM
Small-Business
0%
Mid-Market
26.8%
Enterprise
73.2%
Nozbe
Small-Business
53.8%
Mid-Market
38.5%
Enterprise
7.7%
Oracle Primavera
Small-Business
22.0%
Mid-Market
25.4%
Enterprise
52.5%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Small-Business
24.7%
Mid-Market
27.2%
Enterprise
48.1%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Marketing and Advertising
15.8%
Construction
37.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
 
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Internet
15.8%
Oil & Energy
9.3%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
 
Insurance
13.2%
Religious Institutions
10.5%
Civil Engineering
8.0%
Higher Education
5.0%
 
Telecommunications
7.5%
Graphic Design
10.5%
Aviation & Aerospace
8.0%
Construction
4.7%
 
Accounting
7.5%
Recreational Facilities and Services
5.3%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Computer Software
4.4%
 
Other
35.8%
Other
42.1%
Other
32.0%
Other
66.0%
CA PPM
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Insurance
13.2%
Telecommunications
7.5%
Accounting
7.5%
Other
35.8%
Nozbe
Marketing and Advertising
15.8%
Internet
15.8%
Religious Institutions
10.5%
Graphic Design
10.5%
Recreational Facilities and Services
5.3%
Other
42.1%
Oracle Primavera
Construction
37.3%
Oil & Energy
9.3%
Civil Engineering
8.0%
Aviation & Aerospace
8.0%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Other
32.0%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
Higher Education
5.0%
Construction
4.7%
Computer Software
4.4%
Other
66.0%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Randy C.
G2 Crowd User

Riccardo F.
User

We still use this at SITE for our projects, especially the P6

John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
Richard M.
Internal Consultant

It's less useful for managing the detail of projects. For project plans, the native Clarity UI is cumbersome, and the integration with MSP is clunky. Project managers end up maintaining separate risk and issue logs, and only using Clarity for ad hoc...

G2 Crowd User

The having to add things and then drill down into it to add things like dates and times. Speaking of adding times, they should just let you type in a time instead of picking an hour and then the minutes in only 5 minute increments. They should also have...

David C.
User in Government Administration

Not very user friendly and our company is probably only using about 20% of the capabilities of Primavera. Training for the program has a high learning curve.

Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

 
CA PPM
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Richard M.
Internal Consultant

It's less useful for managing the detail of projects. For project plans, the native Clarity UI is cumbersome, and the integration with MSP is clunky. Project managers end up maintaining separate risk and issue logs, and only using Clarity for ad hoc...

Nozbe
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Randy C.
G2 Crowd User

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 Crowd User

The having to add things and then drill down into it to add things like dates and times. Speaking of adding times, they should just let you type in a time instead of picking an hour and then the minutes in only 5 minute increments. They should also have...

Oracle Primavera
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Riccardo F.
User

We still use this at SITE for our projects, especially the P6

Most Helpful Critical Review
David C.
User in Government Administration

Not very user friendly and our company is probably only using about 20% of the capabilities of Primavera. Training for the program has a high learning curve.

Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

Screenshots

 
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 4
2 of 4
3 of 4
4 of 4
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3

Videos

 No videos providedNo videos provided

Discover how Oracle Primavera can help you gain complete visibility and control into your project portfolios, improve decision-making, standardize processes, and demonstrate business value.

No videos provided
CA PPM
No videos provided
Nozbe
No videos provided
Oracle Primavera

Discover how Oracle Primavera can help you gain complete visibility and control into your project portfolios, improve decision-making, standardize processes, and demonstrate business value.

Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
No videos provided

Downloads

 No downloads providedNo downloads providedNo downloads provided
CA PPM
No downloads provided
Nozbe
No downloads provided
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
No downloads provided
Ask CA PPM a QuestionContact CA PPMAsk Nozbe a QuestionContact NozbeAsk Oracle Primavera a QuestionContact Oracle PrimaveraRequest More InformationRequest More Information