Compare CoSchedule vs MindManager
See this
comparison of CoSchedule vs. MindManager
based on data from user reviews. CoSchedule rates 4.4/5 stars with 89 reviews. MindManager rates 4.6/5 stars with 30 reviews. Each product's score is calculated by real-time data from verified user reviews.

Pricing

 
Individual
$40
user/month (paid annually)
MindManager for Windows
$349
 
Growth
$80
user/month (paid annually)
MindManager for Mac
$179
 
Professional
$400
user/month (paid annually)
 
Enterprise
$1400
user/month (paid annually)
 
Free Trial
Free Trial Unavailable
CoSchedule
Individual
$40user/month (paid annually)
Growth
$80user/month (paid annually)
Professional
$400user/month (paid annually)
Enterprise
$1400user/month (paid annually)
Free Trial
MindManager
MindManager for Windows
$349
MindManager for Mac
$179
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
8.4
8.5
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
8.6
9.0
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
8.4
8.8
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
8.6
8.5
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
8.9
8.3
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
9.2
8.6
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
9.2
Meets Requirements
CoSchedule
8.4
MindManager
8.5
Ease of Use
CoSchedule
8.6
MindManager
9.0
Ease of Setup
CoSchedule
8.4
MindManager
8.8
Ease of Admin
CoSchedule
8.6
MindManager
8.5
Quality of Support
CoSchedule
8.9
MindManager
8.3
Ease of Doing Business With
CoSchedule
9.2
MindManager
8.6
Product Direction (% positive)
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
9.2

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
9.1
Due Dates
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
8.1
Task Prioritization
CoSchedule
8.3
MindManager
8.2
To-Do Lists
CoSchedule
8.7
MindManager
8.6
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
CoSchedule
8.7
MindManager
7.4
Comments
CoSchedule
8.2
MindManager
7.7
Documents and Uploads
CoSchedule
7.4
MindManager
8.1
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
CoSchedule
8.0
MindManager
8.0
Calendar View
CoSchedule
9.2
MindManager
8.0
Baselining / KPIs
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
7.3
Project Budgeting
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.7
Issue Tracking
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
8.2
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
8.3
Portfolio Budgeting
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
Not enough data available
What-If Scenarios
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
9.5
Workflow
CoSchedule
8.3
MindManager
9.8
Request Management
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
8.0
Cost Tracking
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
Not enough data available
ROI and Forecasting
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
Not enough data available
Risk Analysis
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
7.0
Resource Management
Resource Database
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.9
Resource Allocation
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.9
Workload Capacity
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.4
Time Tracking
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.1
Platform
Alerts
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
6.3
Mobile
CoSchedule
6.7
MindManager
6.5
User, Role, and Access Management
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
6.7
API / Integrations
CoSchedule
7.6
MindManager
6.1
Reporting and Dashboards
CoSchedule
7.3
MindManager
8.1
Customization
CoSchedule
7.9
MindManager
7.3
Performance and Reliability
CoSchedule
9.1
MindManager
8.3

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
66.3%
44.8%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
31.4%
20.7%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
2.3%
34.5%
CoSchedule
Small-Business
66.3%
Mid-Market
31.4%
Enterprise
2.3%
MindManager
Small-Business
44.8%
Mid-Market
20.7%
Enterprise
34.5%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Marketing and Advertising
20.5%
Information Technology and Services
13.9%
 
Internet
11.8%
Computer Software
11.1%
 
Computer Software
9.4%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.6%
 
Non-Profit Organization Management
5.5%
Real Estate
5.6%
 
Information Technology and Services
5.5%
Medical Devices
5.6%
 
Other
47.2%
Other
58.3%
CoSchedule
Marketing and Advertising
20.5%
Internet
11.8%
Computer Software
9.4%
Non-Profit Organization Management
5.5%
Information Technology and Services
5.5%
Other
47.2%
MindManager
Information Technology and Services
13.9%
Computer Software
11.1%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.6%
Real Estate
5.6%
Medical Devices
5.6%
Other
58.3%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Rob Z.
User in Internet

Browser extension and social media scheduling tool are easy to use and make scheduling content a breeze. Calendar view is really helpful for coordinating content initiatives across the team. Interface is pretty intuitive, but could improve. Google doc...

David I.
User in Architecture & Planning

The way mind maps are structured is perfect for the way I think and organize my throughts.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
Jaime H.
Consultant in Marketing and Advertising

When we tried to implement CoSchedule with some small clients they really liked the features, but with fewer people to coordinate, the cost didn't end up being worth the functionality

Cameron E.
Internal Consultant in Insurance

It is still clunky and not able to be tweaked to my teams needs. It's a good tool, but to much work is needed to make it the go to tool. Also we need a little more customization to build in the frame work of a project. Agile vs. Interative (Waterfall I...

 
CoSchedule
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Rob Z.
User in Internet

Browser extension and social media scheduling tool are easy to use and make scheduling content a breeze. Calendar view is really helpful for coordinating content initiatives across the team. Interface is pretty intuitive, but could improve. Google doc...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Jaime H.
Consultant in Marketing and Advertising

When we tried to implement CoSchedule with some small clients they really liked the features, but with fewer people to coordinate, the cost didn't end up being worth the functionality

MindManager
Most Helpful Favorable Review
David I.
User in Architecture & Planning

The way mind maps are structured is perfect for the way I think and organize my throughts.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Cameron E.
Internal Consultant in Insurance

It is still clunky and not able to be tweaked to my teams needs. It's a good tool, but to much work is needed to make it the go to tool. Also we need a little more customization to build in the frame work of a project. Agile vs. Interative (Waterfall I...

Screenshots

 
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
Request More InformationRequest More InformationAsk MindManager a QuestionContact MindManager