Compare Favro, Sciforma, CA PPM, and Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management

Pricing

 
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
 
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
 
Project Online Premium
$55
/User/Month
 
Project Online Professional
$30
/User/Month
 
Project Online Essentials
$7
/User/Month
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Favro
Free Trial Unavailable
Sciforma
Free Trial
CA PPM
Free Trial Unavailable
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
Project Online Premium
$55/User/Month
Project Online Professional
$30/User/Month
Project Online Essentials
$7/User/Month
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
8.8
7.3
7.6
8.3
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
8.9
6.4
6.6
7.2
Ease of Setup
Ease of SetupNot enough data available
5.9
5.6
7.5
Ease of Admin
Ease of AdminNot enough data available
6.9
6.4
7.6
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
8.3
8.2
6.4
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business WithNot enough data available
8.9
7.6
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
8.3
5.6
6.5
Meets Requirements
Favro
8.8
Sciforma
7.3
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Ease of Use
Favro
8.9
Sciforma
6.4
CA PPM
6.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.2
Ease of Setup
Favro
Not enough data available
Sciforma
5.9
CA PPM
5.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Admin
Favro
Not enough data available
Sciforma
6.9
CA PPM
6.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Quality of Support
Favro
8.3
Sciforma
8.2
CA PPM
6.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Favro
Not enough data available
Sciforma
8.9
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Favro
7.8
Sciforma
8.3
CA PPM
5.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
6.5

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
Favro
9.1
Sciforma
7.4
CA PPM
7.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.4
Due Dates
Favro
9.1
Sciforma
7.7
CA PPM
7.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.5
Task Prioritization
Favro
8.1
Sciforma
6.7
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.2
To-Do Lists
Favro
9.0
Sciforma
Not enough data available
CA PPM
7.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
Favro
8.3
Sciforma
7.5
CA PPM
7.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Comments
Favro
7.8
Sciforma
7.9
CA PPM
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Documents and Uploads
Favro
8.2
Sciforma
6.0
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
Favro
8.1
Sciforma
7.1
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.6
Calendar View
Favro
8.2
Sciforma
7.8
CA PPM
7.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Baselining / KPIs
Favro
7.0
Sciforma
7.6
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Project Budgeting
Favro
6.7
Sciforma
7.7
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Issue Tracking
Favro
8.1
Sciforma
7.2
CA PPM
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
Favro
8.5
Sciforma
7.6
CA PPM
7.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Portfolio Budgeting
Favro
7.5
Sciforma
7.5
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
What-If Scenarios
Favro
7.1
Sciforma
7.3
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Workflow
Favro
7.6
Sciforma
7.9
CA PPM
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Request Management
Favro
7.3
Sciforma
Not enough data available
CA PPM
7.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Cost Tracking
Favro
6.7
Sciforma
8.5
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
ROI and Forecasting
Favro
6.9
Sciforma
Not enough data available
CA PPM
7.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Risk Analysis
Favro
6.9
Sciforma
6.9
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Resource Management
Resource Database
Favro
7.4
Sciforma
8.2
CA PPM
7.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Resource Allocation
Favro
7.5
Sciforma
7.5
CA PPM
7.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Workload Capacity
Favro
7.4
Sciforma
7.3
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Time Tracking
Favro
7.9
Sciforma
7.9
CA PPM
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Platform
Alerts
Favro
8.6
Sciforma
7.3
CA PPM
7.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Mobile
Favro
7.8
Sciforma
7.0
CA PPM
5.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.0
User, Role, and Access Management
Favro
8.0
Sciforma
7.8
CA PPM
7.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
API / Integrations
Favro
8.0
Sciforma
7.3
CA PPM
6.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Reporting and Dashboards
Favro
8.7
Sciforma
7.3
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Customization
Favro
8.6
Sciforma
8.3
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Performance and Reliability
Favro
8.9
Sciforma
7.2
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
46.7%
0%
0%
24.7%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
46.7%
50.0%
26.8%
27.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
6.7%
50.0%
73.2%
48.1%
Favro
Small-Business
46.7%
Mid-Market
46.7%
Enterprise
6.7%
Sciforma
Small-Business
0%
Mid-Market
50.0%
Enterprise
50.0%
CA PPM
Small-Business
0%
Mid-Market
26.8%
Enterprise
73.2%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Small-Business
24.7%
Mid-Market
27.2%
Enterprise
48.1%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Research
14.8%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
 
Medical Devices
14.8%
Building Materials
13.3%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
 
Entertainment
11.1%
Retail
6.7%
Insurance
13.2%
Higher Education
5.0%
 
Computer Software
11.1%
Research
6.7%
Telecommunications
7.5%
Construction
4.7%
 
Publishing
7.4%
Pharmaceuticals
6.7%
Accounting
7.5%
Computer Software
4.4%
 
Other
40.7%
Other
53.3%
Other
35.8%
Other
66.0%
Favro
Research
14.8%
Medical Devices
14.8%
Entertainment
11.1%
Computer Software
11.1%
Publishing
7.4%
Other
40.7%
Sciforma
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Building Materials
13.3%
Retail
6.7%
Research
6.7%
Pharmaceuticals
6.7%
Other
53.3%
CA PPM
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Insurance
13.2%
Telecommunications
7.5%
Accounting
7.5%
Other
35.8%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
Higher Education
5.0%
Construction
4.7%
Computer Software
4.4%
Other
66.0%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Javier D.
User

It is one of the best project organizers, with a simple and easy to use interface, through labels you can order and plan the tasks necessary for the realization of each project, assign them to your work team and establish deadlines, the boards they adapt to...

Edwin C.
Consultant

Sciforma is really intuitive for work with PPM. It allowes you to work with resource managment, task, projects, demands and portfolios. Also, it allowes you to create your own fields in order to get the kpi you need to track your projects. So the software...

James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
Antonio Jesús C.
User

Maybe is quite complicated to see the relations between cards, it could be more simple.

G2 Crowd User in Retail

The Java tool is very hard to configure. It is not intuitive. There are no user manuals. The search system for the Knowledge Base is frustrating and a waste of time. v7.0 is a vast improvement from v5.0 but compared to other tools in the market (HP, MS...

Tiberius F.
User in Automotive

My dislikes are: User driven customization of the product is not fully supported by Clarity PPM. CA PPM only allows data extraction to third party software and does not support full integration. No social collaboration features

Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

 
Favro
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Javier D.
User

It is one of the best project organizers, with a simple and easy to use interface, through labels you can order and plan the tasks necessary for the realization of each project, assign them to your work team and establish deadlines, the boards they adapt to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Antonio Jesús C.
User

Maybe is quite complicated to see the relations between cards, it could be more simple.

Sciforma
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Edwin C.
Consultant

Sciforma is really intuitive for work with PPM. It allowes you to work with resource managment, task, projects, demands and portfolios. Also, it allowes you to create your own fields in order to get the kpi you need to track your projects. So the software...

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 Crowd User in Retail

The Java tool is very hard to configure. It is not intuitive. There are no user manuals. The search system for the Knowledge Base is frustrating and a waste of time. v7.0 is a vast improvement from v5.0 but compared to other tools in the market (HP, MS...

CA PPM
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Tiberius F.
User in Automotive

My dislikes are: User driven customization of the product is not fully supported by Clarity PPM. CA PPM only allows data extraction to third party software and does not support full integration. No social collaboration features

Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

Screenshots

 No screenshots provided
1 of 6
2 of 6
3 of 6
4 of 6
5 of 6
6 of 6
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
Favro
No screenshots provided
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Ask Favro a QuestionContact FavroAsk Sciforma a QuestionContact SciformaAsk CA PPM a QuestionContact CA PPMRequest More InformationRequest More Information