Compare Micro Focus PPM, Rukovoditel, CA PPM, and Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management

Pricing

 
Standard Part
$0 No Restrictions
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
 
Extension
$95 No Restrictions
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
 
Project Online Premium
$55 /User/Month
 
Project Online Professional
$30 /User/Month
 
Project Online Essentials
$7 /User/Month
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Micro Focus PPM
Free Trial Unavailable
Rukovoditel
Standard Part
$0No Restrictions
Extension
$95No Restrictions
Free Trial Unavailable
CA PPM
Free Trial Unavailable
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
Project Online Premium
$55/User/Month
Project Online Professional
$30/User/Month
Project Online Essentials
$7/User/Month
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
8.3
9.2
7.6
8.3
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
6.8
9.2
6.6
7.2
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
7.7
9.2
5.6
7.5
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
8.4
8.8
6.4
7.6
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
7.2
9.3
6.4
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
8.0
Not enough data available
7.6
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
6.7
9.1
5.6
6.5
Meets Requirements
Micro Focus PPM
8.3
Rukovoditel
9.2
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Ease of Use
Micro Focus PPM
6.8
Rukovoditel
9.2
CA PPM
6.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.2
Ease of Setup
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.2
CA PPM
5.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Admin
Micro Focus PPM
8.4
Rukovoditel
8.8
CA PPM
6.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Quality of Support
Micro Focus PPM
7.2
Rukovoditel
9.3
CA PPM
6.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Micro Focus PPM
8.0
Rukovoditel
Not enough data available
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Micro Focus PPM
6.7
Rukovoditel
9.1
CA PPM
5.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
6.5

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
Micro Focus PPM
7.9
Rukovoditel
9.3
CA PPM
7.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.4
Due Dates
Micro Focus PPM
8.1
Rukovoditel
9.5
CA PPM
7.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.5
Task Prioritization
Micro Focus PPM
7.8
Rukovoditel
9.0
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.2
To-Do Lists
Micro Focus PPM
7.2
Rukovoditel
8.8
CA PPM
7.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
Micro Focus PPM
7.6
Rukovoditel
8.9
CA PPM
7.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Comments
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.2
CA PPM
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Documents and Uploads
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
8.5
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
Micro Focus PPM
7.8
Rukovoditel
8.5
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.6
Calendar View
Micro Focus PPM
7.5
Rukovoditel
9.0
CA PPM
7.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Baselining / KPIs
Micro Focus PPM
7.1
Rukovoditel
8.8
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Project Budgeting
Micro Focus PPM
8.2
Rukovoditel
8.1
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Issue Tracking
Micro Focus PPM
8.2
Rukovoditel
9.2
CA PPM
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
Micro Focus PPM
7.9
Rukovoditel
9.7
CA PPM
7.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Portfolio Budgeting
Micro Focus PPM
7.8
Rukovoditel
Not enough data available
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
What-If Scenarios
Micro Focus PPM
7.4
Rukovoditel
9.3
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Workflow
Micro Focus PPM
8.1
Rukovoditel
Not enough data available
CA PPM
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Request Management
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.0
CA PPM
7.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Cost Tracking
Micro Focus PPM
7.6
Rukovoditel
9.0
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
ROI and Forecasting
Micro Focus PPM
7.2
Rukovoditel
Not enough data available
CA PPM
7.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Risk Analysis
Micro Focus PPM
7.9
Rukovoditel
8.7
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Resource Management
Resource Database
Micro Focus PPM
8.1
Rukovoditel
9.7
CA PPM
7.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Resource Allocation
Micro Focus PPM
7.4
Rukovoditel
Not enough data available
CA PPM
7.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Workload Capacity
Micro Focus PPM
8.0
Rukovoditel
8.7
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Time Tracking
Micro Focus PPM
8.3
Rukovoditel
Not enough data available
CA PPM
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Platform
Alerts
Micro Focus PPM
8.0
Rukovoditel
7.8
CA PPM
7.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Mobile
Micro Focus PPM
5.6
Rukovoditel
8.5
CA PPM
5.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.0
User, Role, and Access Management
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
8.9
CA PPM
7.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
API / Integrations
Micro Focus PPM
6.8
Rukovoditel
9.2
CA PPM
6.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Reporting and Dashboards
Micro Focus PPM
7.5
Rukovoditel
8.6
CA PPM
7.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Customization
Micro Focus PPM
7.4
Rukovoditel
9.5
CA PPM
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Performance and Reliability
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.8
CA PPM
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
9.5%
41.7%
0%
24.7%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
28.6%
41.7%
26.8%
27.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
61.9%
16.7%
73.2%
48.1%
Micro Focus PPM
Small-Business
9.5%
Mid-Market
28.6%
Enterprise
61.9%
Rukovoditel
Small-Business
41.7%
Mid-Market
41.7%
Enterprise
16.7%
CA PPM
Small-Business
0%
Mid-Market
26.8%
Enterprise
73.2%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Small-Business
24.7%
Mid-Market
27.2%
Enterprise
48.1%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Information Technology and Services
34.6%
Restaurants
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
 
Telecommunications
11.5%
Food & Beverages
12.5%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
 
Management Consulting
7.7%
Computer Software
12.5%
Insurance
13.2%
Higher Education
5.0%
 
Insurance
7.7%
Outsourcing/Offshoring
6.3%
Telecommunications
7.5%
Construction
4.7%
 
Non-Profit Organization Management
3.8%
Medical Devices
6.3%
Accounting
7.5%
Computer Software
4.4%
 
Other
34.6%
Other
50.0%
Other
35.8%
Other
66.0%
Micro Focus PPM
Information Technology and Services
34.6%
Telecommunications
11.5%
Management Consulting
7.7%
Insurance
7.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
3.8%
Other
34.6%
Rukovoditel
Restaurants
12.5%
Food & Beverages
12.5%
Computer Software
12.5%
Outsourcing/Offshoring
6.3%
Medical Devices
6.3%
Other
50.0%
CA PPM
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Insurance
13.2%
Telecommunications
7.5%
Accounting
7.5%
Other
35.8%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
Higher Education
5.0%
Construction
4.7%
Computer Software
4.4%
Other
66.0%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Ajay M.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

HPE PPM: - Provides visibility into strategic, operational demands of the organisation. - Its ability to provide real-time information about the projects, resources, financnes, programs and portfolios, visibility of this information allows...

Ewald B.
Administrator in Management Consulting

I was looking for a Project Management System for my company and was already tired of testing, because most systems are buggy, outdated, overloaded with functions and not very flexible. Luckily I discovered Rukovoditel, which fulfills all my...

James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 Crowd User in Automotive

In our workforce, PPM is mandatory and required, but nobody likes using it. It's bulky, it's slow, and the UI is not intuitive. Many features are hidden behind screens that are hard to find without proper guidance or training. Recalling timesheets is a pain.

Richard M.
Internal Consultant

It's less useful for managing the detail of projects. For project plans, the native Clarity UI is cumbersome, and the integration with MSP is clunky. Project managers end up maintaining separate risk and issue logs, and only using Clarity for ad hoc...

Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

 
Micro Focus PPM
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Ajay M.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

HPE PPM: - Provides visibility into strategic, operational demands of the organisation. - Its ability to provide real-time information about the projects, resources, financnes, programs and portfolios, visibility of this information allows...

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 Crowd User in Automotive

In our workforce, PPM is mandatory and required, but nobody likes using it. It's bulky, it's slow, and the UI is not intuitive. Many features are hidden behind screens that are hard to find without proper guidance or training. Recalling timesheets is a pain.

Rukovoditel
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Ewald B.
Administrator in Management Consulting

I was looking for a Project Management System for my company and was already tired of testing, because most systems are buggy, outdated, overloaded with functions and not very flexible. Luckily I discovered Rukovoditel, which fulfills all my...

CA PPM
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Richard M.
Internal Consultant

It's less useful for managing the detail of projects. For project plans, the native Clarity UI is cumbersome, and the integration with MSP is clunky. Project managers end up maintaining separate risk and issue logs, and only using Clarity for ad hoc...

Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

Screenshots

 
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
1 of 6
2 of 6
3 of 6
4 of 6
5 of 6
6 of 6
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
Micro Focus PPM
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Ask Micro Focus PPM a QuestionContact Micro Focus PPMAsk Rukovoditel a QuestionContact RukovoditelAsk CA PPM a QuestionContact CA PPMRequest More InformationRequest More Information