Compare Planview, RoboHead, Microsoft Project Server, and CA PPM

Pricing

 
Project Online Essentials
$7 per user per month
 
Project Online Professional
$30 per user per month
 
Project Online Premium
$55 per user per month
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Planview
Free Trial Unavailable
RoboHead
Free Trial Unavailable
Microsoft Project Server
Project Online Essentials
$7per user per month
Project Online Professional
$30per user per month
Project Online Premium
$55per user per month
Free Trial Unavailable
CA PPM
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
7.6
8.3
8.6
7.6
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
6.7
7.8
7.2
6.6
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
5.8
Not enough data available
6.4
5.6
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
7.0
Not enough data available
7.0
6.4
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
7.1
8.1
7.7
6.4
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
7.7
Not enough data available
7.7
7.6
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
6.6
7.7
7.1
5.6
Meets Requirements
Planview
7.6
RoboHead
8.3
Microsoft Project Server
8.6
CA PPM
7.6
Ease of Use
Planview
6.7
RoboHead
7.8
Microsoft Project Server
7.2
CA PPM
6.6
Ease of Setup
Planview
5.8
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
6.4
CA PPM
5.6
Ease of Admin
Planview
7.0
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.0
CA PPM
6.4
Quality of Support
Planview
7.1
RoboHead
8.1
Microsoft Project Server
7.7
CA PPM
6.4
Ease of Doing Business With
Planview
7.7
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.7
CA PPM
7.6
Product Direction (% positive)
Planview
6.6
RoboHead
7.7
Microsoft Project Server
7.1
CA PPM
5.6

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
Planview
8.1
RoboHead
9.0
Microsoft Project Server
8.4
CA PPM
7.8
Due Dates
Planview
7.9
RoboHead
9.1
Microsoft Project Server
8.3
CA PPM
7.8
Task Prioritization
Planview
7.6
RoboHead
8.8
Microsoft Project Server
8.0
CA PPM
7.4
To-Do Lists
Planview
7.6
RoboHead
7.8
Microsoft Project Server
8.0
CA PPM
7.2
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
Planview
7.5
RoboHead
8.6
Microsoft Project Server
8.2
CA PPM
7.2
Comments
Planview
8.1
RoboHead
6.7
Microsoft Project Server
7.4
CA PPM
6.7
Documents and Uploads
Planview
6.8
RoboHead
7.7
Microsoft Project Server
7.9
CA PPM
7.4
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
Planview
7.1
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
9.1
CA PPM
7.3
Calendar View
Planview
6.8
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
8.2
CA PPM
7.2
Baselining / KPIs
Planview
7.4
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.9
CA PPM
7.4
Project Budgeting
Planview
7.5
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
8.0
CA PPM
7.4
Issue Tracking
Planview
7.1
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.5
CA PPM
6.7
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
Planview
7.3
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
8.5
CA PPM
7.8
Portfolio Budgeting
Planview
7.7
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
8.1
CA PPM
7.4
What-If Scenarios
Planview
6.7
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.0
CA PPM
7.3
Workflow
Planview
7.0
RoboHead
9.0
Microsoft Project Server
7.9
CA PPM
6.7
Request Management
Planview
7.0
RoboHead
8.3
Microsoft Project Server
7.6
CA PPM
7.1
Cost Tracking
Planview
7.6
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
8.0
CA PPM
7.3
ROI and Forecasting
Planview
7.9
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.8
CA PPM
7.0
Risk Analysis
Planview
7.6
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.6
CA PPM
7.3
Resource Management
Resource Database
Planview
7.6
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
8.0
CA PPM
7.9
Resource Allocation
Planview
8.1
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
8.0
CA PPM
7.5
Workload Capacity
Planview
8.1
RoboHead
9.2
Microsoft Project Server
7.9
CA PPM
7.6
Time Tracking
Planview
8.2
RoboHead
9.3
Microsoft Project Server
8.6
CA PPM
8.1
Platform
Alerts
Planview
7.0
RoboHead
9.7
Microsoft Project Server
6.9
CA PPM
7.0
Mobile
Planview
Not enough data available
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
6.0
CA PPM
5.8
User, Role, and Access Management
Planview
7.8
RoboHead
9.5
Microsoft Project Server
7.8
CA PPM
7.1
API / Integrations
Planview
7.6
RoboHead
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project Server
7.4
CA PPM
6.3
Reporting and Dashboards
Planview
7.2
RoboHead
8.7
Microsoft Project Server
7.7
CA PPM
7.6
Customization
Planview
7.7
RoboHead
9.2
Microsoft Project Server
7.4
CA PPM
7.3
Performance and Reliability
Planview
7.7
RoboHead
8.3
Microsoft Project Server
8.3
CA PPM
7.4

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
3.7%
16.7%
6.3%
0%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
14.8%
58.3%
43.8%
26.8%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
81.5%
25.0%
50.0%
73.2%
Planview
Small-Business
3.7%
Mid-Market
14.8%
Enterprise
81.5%
RoboHead
Small-Business
16.7%
Mid-Market
58.3%
Enterprise
25.0%
Microsoft Project Server
Small-Business
6.3%
Mid-Market
43.8%
Enterprise
50.0%
CA PPM
Small-Business
0%
Mid-Market
26.8%
Enterprise
73.2%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Information Technology and Services
20.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
22.7%
Information Technology and Services
23.8%
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
 
Internet
17.2%
Hospital & Health Care
13.6%
Computer Software
14.3%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
 
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
9.1%
Higher Education
7.9%
Insurance
13.2%
 
Insurance
6.9%
Design
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Telecommunications
7.5%
 
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Consumer Goods
9.1%
Financial Services
4.8%
Accounting
7.5%
 
Other
37.9%
Other
36.4%
Other
42.9%
Other
35.8%
Planview
Information Technology and Services
20.7%
Internet
17.2%
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.3%
Insurance
6.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Other
37.9%
RoboHead
Non-Profit Organization Management
22.7%
Hospital & Health Care
13.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
9.1%
Design
9.1%
Consumer Goods
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Microsoft Project Server
Information Technology and Services
23.8%
Computer Software
14.3%
Higher Education
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Financial Services
4.8%
Other
42.9%
CA PPM
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Insurance
13.2%
Telecommunications
7.5%
Accounting
7.5%
Other
35.8%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 Crowd User in Internet

It’s a quick and simple way for employees to entire their time sheets and for us to track hours logged across different orgs and towards specific tasks.

G2 Crowd User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad

RoboHead allows separate campaigns, tasks, goals, and custom fields, across multiple teams and roles which makes it very flexible. The ability to comment on version-controlled reviews, and use gantt charts for planning take it to the next level.

G2 Crowd User

MS Project server allows you to easily organize goals and milestones for multiple projects that you may be working on at the same time.

James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
Lisa F.
User in Hospital & Health Care

The corporate setup was not consistent with maximum of Planview. If the enterprise had not modified it so much, it would have been better adapted and utilized within the organization.

G2 Crowd User in Consumer Goods

Loading and launching and installing the progeam takes some time

G2 Crowd User in Government Relations

MS Project Server has room to grow in the risk management/decision tools area. The present libraries are enhanced SharePoint lists and not integrated in the schedule and decision/driver libraries. Overall I would give this service a B.

Richard M.
Internal Consultant

It's less useful for managing the detail of projects. For project plans, the native Clarity UI is cumbersome, and the integration with MSP is clunky. Project managers end up maintaining separate risk and issue logs, and only using Clarity for ad hoc...

 
Planview
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 Crowd User in Internet

It’s a quick and simple way for employees to entire their time sheets and for us to track hours logged across different orgs and towards specific tasks.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Lisa F.
User in Hospital & Health Care

The corporate setup was not consistent with maximum of Planview. If the enterprise had not modified it so much, it would have been better adapted and utilized within the organization.

RoboHead
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 Crowd User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad

RoboHead allows separate campaigns, tasks, goals, and custom fields, across multiple teams and roles which makes it very flexible. The ability to comment on version-controlled reviews, and use gantt charts for planning take it to the next level.

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 Crowd User in Consumer Goods

Loading and launching and installing the progeam takes some time

Microsoft Project Server
Most Helpful Favorable Review
G2 Crowd User

MS Project server allows you to easily organize goals and milestones for multiple projects that you may be working on at the same time.

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 Crowd User in Government Relations

MS Project Server has room to grow in the risk management/decision tools area. The present libraries are enhanced SharePoint lists and not integrated in the schedule and decision/driver libraries. Overall I would give this service a B.

CA PPM
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Richard M.
Internal Consultant

It's less useful for managing the detail of projects. For project plans, the native Clarity UI is cumbersome, and the integration with MSP is clunky. Project managers end up maintaining separate risk and issue logs, and only using Clarity for ad hoc...

Screenshots

 
No screenshots providedNo screenshots provided
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
Planview
RoboHead
No screenshots provided
Microsoft Project Server
No screenshots provided
Ask Planview a QuestionContact PlanviewAsk RoboHead a QuestionContact RoboHeadRequest More InformationRequest More InformationAsk CA PPM a QuestionContact CA PPM