What do you like best?
There are integration with Google Drive, dropbox. To and in any standard kanban service there are functions of file attachments and comments to tasks. Unlike analogs, it has the ability to access guest users (for example, a client), there is minimal analytics. There is a paid and free version, comparing analogs are fashionable to say that pricing is quite affordable. All information is available at any time, as there is the possibility of using the web interface and integration with the mail client.
What do you dislike?
Weak analytics. To work in the project, you need tools for estimating and recording costs, keeping track of the time and load of participants, the presence of TODO sheets in tasks. The most inconvenient is the lack of prioritization. The presence of project templates did not save much time in the work.
Recommendations to others considering the product
Available functionality in use and installation. I recommend to the managers, project managers first of all.
For personal use, it can be useful to anyone who works with several tasks for a long time.
What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?
The visual location of tasks allows you to immediately assess the scope of work and the time allotted for the implementation. Information can be highlighted in different colors for better perception. Participants comment on the cards in real time, and not necessarily all at the same time in the office or conference mode.